Lady Despenser's Scribery - Introduction

This small corner of the web concentrates mainly on the life and times of Hugh Despenser the younger, as well as the reign of Edward II and the fourteenth century in general. It contains snippets of some (though certainly not all) of the research I have done in order to write a novel about him (and hopefully, later, a biography as well). Oh yes, some 21st century stuff sneaks its way in too, from time to time!

Sunday, 20 September 2009

The Website, Getting Ready for the 'Big Write' and other stuff

A round up on a few things...

Website:
The transferring of content from both my own and Alianore's blogs onto the main website is almost done (phew!). As I'm sure you can imagine - there is alot of it - over 200 pages so far! And it all has to be formatted and linked etc, etc, etc! But, I'm now a week or so away to the first live test, so the launch date is looking good for the beginning-mid October - as long as nothing goes hideously wrong!

The 'Big Write'
Well, I call it that anyway. Once the website is up and running I am going into a sort of semi-seclusion in order to write my Despenser novel. The reason I started the blog in the first place was due to researching the darn thing but now I feel I have enough to start the first draft in earnest. Lots of scenes are already coming to mind and flowing easily onto the page - always a good sign. As you would expect, it will be as historically accurate as possible but it will also be, in some places, quite graphic too. In fact, think of The Tudors - but with more accuracy and you will have some sense of the tone and atmosphere.

However, in order to concentrate on this, I will have to cut back a bit on blog posts - especially the heavily researched ones (unless it happens to be something I am writing on at the time), This doesn't mean that I won't be posting at all though - either here or on the new website - and hopefully I will still be putting the odd historical post combined with writing updates (and maybe snippets) and also some lighter stuff. There just may be some longer gaps in between posts. So please bear with me and hopefully your patience will be rewarded when the novel is done.

The Hulton Skeleton - again.
Finally, some UK viewers may have seen a small piece about Hugh Despenser on the One Show the other night. This was basically rehashed information from February 2008 about the finding of a skeleton at Hulton Abbey bearing the marks of being hung, drawn and quartered. It is the archaeologist's belief that the bones belong to Hugh. Although in some ways it would be nice to know his remains had been discovered, I do have some serious doubts which I laid out in this post. Even so, it was still good to see Hugh's name mentioned on prime time TV!

Tuesday, 8 September 2009

A Short Summary of Ed’s 1322 Campaign and Why He Lost


I’ve now done all of the serious stuff on this Scottish Campaign of Edward’s so now I’ll try and sum it all up in a much shorter post.

Basically:

After the two year truce of 1319 ended in December 1321, Robert Bruce started, rather annoyingly, to get up to his old tricks again - popping over the border to do a spot of terrorising and to running a protection racket for northern towns that could afford it.

Edward was rather hacked off about this (not as much as his northern subjects though, I’ll bet) and so decided to invade Scotland to teach that nasty Bruce a lesson. The following then happened:

1. Edward spent a lot of time mustering his forces and making preparations regarding supplies etc (Good). This took rather a lot of time, in which Bruce managed to pop over for yet another visit (Bad).

2. Edward gathered one of the largest armies ever to march into Scotland (Good). That huge army needed huge amounts of food and drink and organisation (Bad)

3. Edward gathered one of the largest armies ever to march into Scotland (again, Good). An army is not much good if it doesn’t have an enemy to fight – the Scots simply vanished (Bad)

4. Edward sent large amounts of supplies by sea (Good). He hadn’t managed though to deal with the Flemish fleet who were intent on disrupting said supplies (Bad).

5. Edward had probably counted on feeding his army off the land (Sort of Good). Bruce operated a ‘scorched earth’ tactic in order to deny them this opportunity (Bad).

6. Edward took his family and comforts north with him (Good – for Edward anyway). Bruce’s tactics meant that Isabella became stranded at Tynemouth and Ed lost most of his baggage train at Byland (very Bad).

7. Edward thought he was safe at Byland, where his army controlled the (very) high ground (Good). Bruce had men who were practically born rolling down mountains and who loved nothing more than a spot of climbing (very, very Bad).

8. Edward lacked experienced commanders (apart from Harclay, who didn’t get there and to whom Ed probably wouldn’t have listened anyway, and Pembroke who didn’t seem to do much) because they had either died or been executed after Boroughbridge (from Bad to Worse). Bruce’s commanders were experienced and able (oh the Woe!)

9. Edward was sadly lacking in his father’s talents – and enthusiasm - for war (I’m not even going to bother to comment any more – you get the drift). Robert Bruce was a seriously, seriously excellent leader, warrior, tactician – one of the best of his time. It was a bit like putting Cheltenham Town football (soccer) team up against Manchester United and expecting them to win (no disrespect to the Robins by the way – they are good enough in their own league!).

So, although Edward wasn’t as completely ill prepared and stupid during this campaign as some have made out, he was always going to be the under-dog. Maybe if Flanders had backed off from his shipping, if his army hadn’t starved and become ill in Scotland, if the weather had been better (it seems that it was pretty stormy and wet throughout that time), if he hadn’t dismissed most of his army before Byland, if he had sent Isabella further south sooner, if… I could go on, but I won’t.

There are also other issues associated with this campaign. The first is the alleged ‘abandonment’ of Isabella to the Scots at Tynemouth by Edward – supposedly at the behest of Hugh Despenser. Alianore has already done a magnificently researched post on this subject here, so I won’t duplicate it (especially as our blogs are soon merging into one web-site). Suffice it to say that Edward and Hugh made strenuous attempts to rescue the queen and her ladies (which included Hugh’s wife) – but Isabella rejected the first men sent (because they contained some of Hugh’s men) and the second contingent were captured at Byland. Thus Isabella made the decision to take a ship (and we know how dodgy THAT was) to safety and in the process two of her ladies died.

The second issue is the appearance of Edward’s illegitimate son, Adam by his side on the campaign. From records we know that Edward paid for his armour and equipment, but after this battle he doesn’t appear anywhere else again, leading to speculation that he might have died at some point around then. The third issue is the ‘treachery’ of Andrew de Harclay some months later when he decided to draw up a treaty between England and Scotland without asking Edward first! Both of these also have their own posts, so if you want to read more, either go here (for Adam), or here (for Harclay).

Tuesday, 1 September 2009

The Battle of Byland 1322


Finally - I've managed to put together this post on Battle of Byland itself
- it feels like it has taken forever - mainly because I had to translate a source from the original Lowland Scots language as well as draw up the battle plan! Someone (Carla) asked me how I make the maps. Well, first I take an original map image (credit to Google Maps in this case), manipulate it so that it is the right size, rotation etc (this one was rotated 90 degrees to make it easier to appeciate the gradients) and then I add anything else - such as battlelines, arrows etc - in Adobe Illustrator. As I'm not that familiar with the package, it does take some trial and error, but I hope that it has the effect of making everything a bit clearer.

Thanks to Alianore for allowing me to use her photos of Sutton Bank. As usual, the photos will come up larger if you click on them.
Anyway...


On the 13th October, according to his itinerary, Edward was at Rievaulx abbey (not Byland abbey, as some chroniclers state) and at vespers sent an urgent message to Aymer de Valance, earl of Pembroke who was obviously not too far away:
“The K. to the Earl of Pembroke. Understanding from his spies that the Scots are around [North] Allerton, commands the Earl to collect his forces and raise the country towards Byland, reaching it by Thursday the 14th as early in the day as possible, where he will find the Earl of Richmond and Henry de Beaumont, with instructions how to act. The K. is near hand in safety collecting his forces.”
North Allerton was less than five miles from Rievaulx, as the crow flies, although to reach Edward the Scottish forces would have to make their way upwards onto the moors. Despite such short notice, the Earl of Pembroke managed to reach the royal army (or what there was of it) and they took up a defensive position. Andrew de Harclay, who had also been summoned, for some reason didn’t make it: his absence was to have grave repercussions not only for Edward for also for himself in the future.

The exact location of the battle is uncertain, although it was somewhere around Old Byland (not Byland Abbey). Modern historians Professor Barrow and I. M. Davis have placed it at Sutton Bank, an escarpment not far from Byland and after a consideration of the accounts I tend to agree. Most accounts of the ba
ttle by English chroniclers are rather sparse – as you would expect considering the outcome. However, a much fuller version is given in the near-contemporary poem The Brus by John Barbour – a Scottish poet who was born around 1320 and died in 1395. His patron was Robert II, grandson of Robert the Bruce through his daughter, Marjorie. He was also the nephew of Robert Bruce’s son and the last of the Bruce male line, David II.

A view of Sutton Bank with the A170 winding its way towards the top

As expected, Barbour’s The Brus, written around 1377, was more or less an homage to Robert Bruce’s greatness and so does suffer from a few exaggerations, errors and patriotic sentiments. But for all that, it is also agreed that the
poem is more truthful than other, similar homages – and Barbour must surely have heard stories of the battle, either from those that were there or there descendants. Therefore I have used Barbour’s version, for the most part, in recreating what happened at Sutton Bank on the morning of the 14th October 1322.

It seems that, the night before, the Scots had performed a night march from their position at North Allerton, hoping to surprise the English. Instead they met with a steep escarpment, known today as Sutton Bank. The English must have been alerted to their night-time movemen
ts for the English forces – under the banners of the earl of Richmond, Henry Beaumont and the earl of Pembroke, had already moved forward from their base at Byland (and here, I’m assuming it is the village of Old Byland, not the abbey – which wouldn’t geographically make sense) to hold the ridge and the one path that led to its summit (possibly the same route as the A170 takes today).

The view West (towards Thirsk) from the summit of the escarpment. It gives a good impression of the height.

Bruce was now faced with a choice: either to attempt the difficult task of fighting up what was more or less a cliff and taking the ridge, or else a 15 mile march around it to Helmsley, where it would be easier to reach Rievaulx. Of course, if they did that, Edward would have had plenty of time to escape. So Bruce made a pretty brave decision and sent James Douglas and his men to assault the path. Not wanting to be left out of the action, the earl of Moray, together with four of his men, also volunteered
to be in the vanguard. Sir James welcomed him warmly and together they led the fierce fighting up the slope. Arrows flew and rocks were hurled down upon the Scots by the English men. Two English knights in particular, fought so valiantly that they were named in the poem: Sir Thomas Ughtred and Sir Ralph Cobham. Ralph Cobham was considered to be the best knight in England, according to Barbour – but at this attack he was outshone by Ughtred who held his ground for longer, although he was then, unfortunately, captured by the Scots.

Sutton Bank again, from the Roulston Scar end - the sort of place the Highlanders may have attempted the climb to get around the rear of the Engish line.

While the English were thus engaged on the ridge and path, Bruce sent men from the Highlands to find a way up the cliffs to one side of the battle. Being more than accustomed to scrambling about in such territory, the force soon scaled the escarpment, outflanked the English and smashed into their rear – just as a sudden push forward by Douglas and his men captured the heights from in front.


Seeing the turn of events, some of the English soldiers fled while the rest fought on bravely and futilely,
either being slain or captured. Among the high-ranking prisoners were John of Brittany, the earl of Richmond, Henry de Beaumont and a French knight, the Lord Sully. Robert had an especial dislike for Richmond as he considered him a war-monger and it is said that the Bruce gave the earl a public dressing down. Later, Sully and a couple of other French knights were released without ransom as a sign of favour and friendship towards the French king.

The author's depiction of the Battle of Byland at Sutton Bank as described in The Brus


Once the Scots had taken the heights at Sutton Bank, Sir Walter Steward and his cavalry swept past the remnants of the battle and headed straight for where they thought Edward II was staying, intent on capturing him as well. The poem makes it clear that he was at Byland (the village, not the abbey), although other historians place him still at Rievaulx. But wherever he was he must have heard of the English defeat almost as the Scottish cavalry were bearing down on him. There must have been a complete panic for him to escape as he left behind all of his possessions, armour and even his privy seal – all of which was captured with great delight by Bruce’s men.

Finding Edward gone, Steward turned his horses towards York, obviously thinking that Edward had gone that way. Upon reaching the city gates, he and his men issued a challenge to any who would come out and fight them. Of course, no-one was so stupid as to accept (there probably weren’t that many fighting men left in the city at that time anyway), so Steward turned and rode back to join the rest of the Scots who were ransacking Rievaulx and Byland Abbeys before settling down there for the night.

Edward, meanwhile (and we must assume, Hugh as well) had taken a more circuitous route from Rievaulx, going first to Bridlington on the coast (see the map in the last post). Maybe he had hoped to find a ship there to take him to safety. But it seems that none were to be had. The next day, flushed with their victory and knowing that no-one would stop them, Bruce’s men continued into the Wold, plundering and destroying the countryside as far as Beverley. Whether they knew Edward was nearby is impossible to know – probably not as they do not seem to have been searching for him. But their presence had the effect of forcing Edward to flee even further south – to Burstwick, before cautiously making his way north and west again to arrive at the archbishop’s palace at Cawood on the 23rd October and entering York itself on the 24th. By this time, Bruce had enough plunder, livestock and prisoners and was making his way back, unchecked, into Scotland.

The Battle of Byland had been a humiliating – and probably completely unexpected – defeat for Edward. After all, not many armies would attempt an attack up such a steep slope, let alone succeed. But once again he had underestimated Bruce’s brilliance as a tactician and commander – skills which Edward, and seemingly his barons, sadly lacked. One of the fallouts from the defeat was that the earl of Carlisle, Andrew de Harclay, realised that Edward could never defeat Bruce and so went ahead and negotiated a truce between England and Scotland without Edward’s knowledge or consent. Although it was probably the most sensible and practical thing to do in the circumstances, it was also treasonable. An incandescent Edward ordered de Harclay’s arrest, soon followed by the traitor’s death of hanging, drawing and quartering in his very own city of Carlisle.



Sources:

The Close Rolls 1318-1323
The Patent Rolls
1321-1324
Calendar of Documents Relating to Scotland

Aymer de Valence, Earl of Pembroke 1307-1324
, J.R.S. Philips
The Tyranny and Fall of Edward II 1321-1326
, Natalie Fryde
Edward II 1307-1327,
Mary Saaler
King Edward II
, Roy Martin Haynes
The Itinerary of Edward II and His Household
, Elizabeth Hallam
The Black Douglas
, I.M. Davis
Robert Bruce and the Community of the Realm of Scotland
, G.W.S Barrow
The Brus
, John Barbour (edited by Emeritus Professor A.A.M. Duncan – accessed at )